U.S. Civil Rights Commission report implicates DOJ, WH in crimes

U.S. Civil Rights Commission report implicates DOJ, WH in crimes

On November 19, 2010, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission released its preliminary report on the investigation into racism, the attempt to disenfranchise Caucasian voters, lying under oath, and a coverup implicating both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the White House. The investigation stemmed from the decision by the Justice Department under Obama appointee Eric Holder to drop all charges against the 3 members of the New Black Panthers who were caught on video intimidating voters with clubs and billysticks outside polling places during the 2008 Presidential election. The complete Civil Rights Commission Report can be found here. In a scathing report detailing corruption at the DOJ and an ensuing coverup by the Obama White House, the Commission report states the following: “For over a year, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (the Commission) has been trying to determine why the U.S. Justice Department took the unusual action of dismissing voter intimidation claims against defendants who did not contest their own liability, as well as significantly scaling back the injunctive relief sought against the remaining defendant.

“The Department has argued that the change (dropping the charges against the New Black Panthers) was based on a review of the totality of the circumstances and was simply a matter of career people disagreeing with other career people about the adequacy of the evidence under the pertinent law. Evidence obtained by the Commission, however, has called this version of events into serious doubt.

“First, two members of the NBPP trial team, Christopher Coates and J. Christian Adams, have testified before the Commission that the lawsuit was strong and that there was no legally sound reason to reverse course. Second, internal Department documents obtained by the Commission show that an independent review of the facts and legal arguments undertaken by career attorneys in the Appellate Section resulted in a recommendation that the case proceed without change.

“The involvement of senior DOJ officials by itself would not be unusual, but the Department’s repeated attempts to obscure the nature of their involvement and other refusals to cooperate raise questions about what the Department is trying to hide. In their appearances before the Commission, which the Department attempted to prevent, trial team members Coates and Adams presented testimony that both raises concerns about the current enforcement policies of the Department and provides a possible explanation for the reversal in the course of the NBPP litigation.

“In sum, they indicated that there is currently a conscious policy within the Department that voting rights laws should not be enforced in a race-neutral fashion. In their testimony, they gave numerous specific examples of open hostility and opposition to pursuing cases in which whites were the perceived victims and minorities the alleged wrongdoers. This testimony includes allegations that some career attorneys refuse to work on such cases; that those who have worked on such cases have been harassed and ostracized; and that some employees, including supervisory attorneys and political appointees, openly oppose race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws.

The 144-page report goes into great detail in delineating a scenario of deep violations of the accepted American premise, ‘Equal justice under the law.’  Instead, there is a mindset within the Department of Justice that presumes anti-discrimination laws apply only to those instances where blacks are victimized by whites.  Instances where the reverse is charged, whites victimized by blacks, are not only ignored by the Department but the subject of outright hostility.

The DOJ failed to adhere to the Commission’s instructions.  Although the White House later denied that executive privilege had been invoked, the DOJ implied to the Commission that the reason for the refusal to provide information was due to exactly that.

As more of this information is uncovered, it would appear that the DOJ-New Black Panther-White House coverup scandal could well be the ‘biggie’ that in time will be the undoing of the Obama Administration. Read more at www.examiner.com